https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12872
--- Comment #32 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomasco...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #30) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #29) > > Hi Marcel and Kyle, what's needed to get this moving again? > > Would love to be able to exclude the internal notes from being indexed (bug > > 15050) > Hard to say. > > Another question is: If we exclude field A from Zebra, do we need to exclude > it from ElasticSearch too ? If we add a pref or a config var, it is on the > instance level. We probably don't want it to be on search engine level ? > > Nick: Could you please report the current status of Elastic in this regard? > How can I exclude a specific field from indexing per INSTANCE in Elastic now > ? Definitely worth re thinking on ES as we could have separate indexes for intranet and OPAC. Filtering should be achieved using the record processor filter over MARC records we already have, before sending for indexing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
