https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=3841
--- Comment #8 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> --- I started looking at this yesterday and was wondering why the framework was sometimes mandatory and sometimes optional. Also: I think we could choose nicer defaults for the ACQ framework, like setting default for not for loan to -1 = on order and remove some fields from display that are very unlikely to be set on order time. Should I open a separate bug report for those suggestions? I think -1 would be really nice to have, otherwise it's just the same as now, but witout the helpful warning on how to change things. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
