https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14769
Janusz Kaczmarek <janus...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |janus...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Janusz Kaczmarek <janus...@gmail.com> ---
Hello to all. To not open a new bug I would like to submit here a patch that
should fix this painful and far-too-long-still-not-resolved issue. The
proposed approach relies on authority records (which should be correct--that's
exactly why they are called 'authority' records). Especially MARC 21 case, as
stated by Zeno, is more complex, specially for 6XX (2nd ind., $2 subfield etc.)
To test -- have some authority recs. with different tags (eg. 100, 130,
150), use them in biblio, especially in 6XX, 7XX (setting 2nd ind).
Have running indexer and proper value of AuthorityMergeLimit, i.e. not 0.
Then play with indicators in authorities. For MARC 21 auth used in 6XX
play also with 008/11 and 040 $f (if 008/11 set to 'z'). Have a look
at the results in biblio (see subfield $2 in MARC 21 6XX if 008/11 = z
and 040 $f defined).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
