https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10047
Agnes Rivers-Moore <a...@hanover.ca> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a...@hanover.ca --- Comment #11 from Agnes Rivers-Moore <a...@hanover.ca> --- Just in case anyone ever revisits this one... As a librarian, having the reservoir separate is a benefit to non-cataloguing staff. When cataloguers search they expect to find records that are not in library stock. For other staff it is confusing to read through multiple variations of a title, looking for the one that has a live item. For that reason reservoir records need to be filtered out from staff searches somehow. >From the technical standpoint, there may be advantages in not loading lots of records to Zebra/Elasticsearch and having system resources spent on fully indexing them, when they may never be added as stock. Z39.50 loads MARC records for all search hits to reservoir. Cataloguers pick one variant, but the rest live on in reservoir until cleaned out. From experience, the reservoir can become larger than the library stock database in as little as a year or so, depending on cataloguing practice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/