https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=20844
Aleisha Amohia <alei...@catalyst.net.nz> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |In Discussion
CC| |alei...@catalyst.net.nz
--- Comment #30 from Aleisha Amohia <alei...@catalyst.net.nz> ---
(In reply to Alex Buckley from comment #29)
>
> It would be good to have a consistent approach throughout Koha for dealing
> with reserves on lost items.
>
> A question do you think it would be best to split this patch up so it is
> only dealing with allocated (waiting) holds. This would alter the behavior
> of the patches on the bug report which check for reserve type of 'waiting'
> or 'reserved'.
>
> Then we would only need to add reserve handling to /tools/batchMod.pl as
> longoverdue.pl and pendingreserves.pl don't touch waiting reserves.
>
> Amending longoverdue.pl and pendingreserves.pl could go in another bug
> report building on this to handle un-allocated holds, just to prevent too
> much scope creep on this bug report?
>
It would be great to have some feedback on this so we know what the next steps
are.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
