https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=19819
David Cook <dc...@prosentient.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dc...@prosentient.com.au
--- Comment #14 from David Cook <dc...@prosentient.com.au> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #9)
> Did you try this patch in production? I am expecting regressions on the
> issues with had on bug 14778 (like "server has gone away").
This was exactly what I was going to say. Database connection caching is a nice
idea but not something you want to implement naively.
I'd suggest not trying to re-invent the wheel on this one, and look somewhere
else for database connection pooling.
And actually looking at C4::Context::dbh... I see that
Koha::Database->schema->storage->dbh... which does cache the $schema object in
a package level variable.
This bug report was opened nearly 2 years ago, so maybe it is no longer
relevant.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
