http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8392
Paul Poulain <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |neng...@gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Paul Poulain <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > Shouldn't we have a rule like "check AgeLimit if there is a birthdate, > > otherwise, it's OK" ? > > I wondered the same thing when I was testing it, but I think it makes sense. > Using BorrowerMandatoryFields acts as a de-facto system preference for > choosing whether or not the age limit should be enforced. If I want to > enforce the age limit on a patron category I want to enforce it on all > patrons, not just patrons for whom I have entered a birth date. It's a change in the behaviour I was not aware. I think it has been introduced in 3.6. I don't see anything about that in the docs: http://manual.koha-community.org/3.8/en/patscirc.html#patcats Adding Nicole. Nicole, please read comment 9 = age limit is checked only if birthdate is a borrower mandatory field ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/