http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8378

Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Needs Signoff               |Failed QA

--- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> ---
Hi wajasu,

I am sorry, but this is not working for me.

My test case:
- 1 overdue item 1 day overdue
- 2 overdue items 2 days overdue

My notice:
<item>"<<biblio.title>>" by <<biblio.author>>, <<items.itemcallnumber>>,
Barcode: <<items.barcode>> Fine: <fine>GBP</fine></item>

Some other configuration:
- Notice triggers: 1 and 2 days using ODUE notice
- Circulation rules: charging interval 1 day, fine 1.50

Running the fine script generated the correct fines - 1.50 and 3.00.

Next I tried creating the notices without your patch, using overdues.pl with
-t.

I got 1 notice with all 3 items listed, which was semi-correct. (It shoud have
given me 2 notices, one 1st notice, one 2nd... but this goes on another bug,
because that's how it works in 3.6 and how it should work for our libraries.)
Fines were not printed out.

After I applied your patch, I got 2 notices (which is better at first glance),
but
- the fine was not printed out and
- each notice only listed 1 item. One of those should have listed 2 items.

Hope my test case is understandable for you, sorry to fail QA.

All was tested on top of 8607.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to