https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11974
David Cook <dc...@prosentient.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dc...@prosentient.com.au
--- Comment #29 from David Cook <dc...@prosentient.com.au> ---
I am very interested in this, as I've been saying for a while that it would be
good for Koha to use Unix sockets instead of TCP sockets when running on the
same host.
I learned a lot reading the comment section, and I'll do some experimenting
locally.
For what it's worth, I've seen huge 100% speed improvements with PostgreSQL
when using Unix sockets over TCP sockets for apps that abuse the database far
worse than Koha. I think it's a universal truth that socket speed works like
this: Unix Socket > Localhost TCP Socket using loopback device > External host
TCP Socket.
In the case of Localhost TCP vs External host TCP, I've seen other apps see
600% performance improvements when dealing with the thousands/millions of
records. On an individual per record basis, the performance improvement might
be a fraction of a second, so the improvement looks very small, but when you
aggregate up the time savings can be *massive*. It depends on your workload.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
