https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25112
Lari Taskula <lari.task...@hypernova.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blocks|25089 |
--- Comment #13 from Lari Taskula <lari.task...@hypernova.fi> ---
(In reply to Joonas Kylmälä from comment #12)
> I agree with Jonathan that this change would make the code
> confusing and also I think it would make it error prone because the coder
> could think the scope is more restricted than what it in reality will be. I
> wonder if there would be any other way to make the rule setting more
> intuitive.
Thanks for the feedback Jonathan and Joonas. It seems we need more opinions and
some support before this can move forward. I'll leave this to "In Discussion"
status.
Since this is not a critical change, the dependency chain that it was built
for, and is currently part of, can use the original set_rules() behavior. So
I'm removing Bug 25089 from the blocker list.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25089
[Bug 25089] Add checkout_type to circulation rules
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
