http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8366
--- Comment #9 from Paul Poulain <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to comment #8) > Sorry for the delay, I was doing some research. Librarians seem to like the > idea of going back to 'Default' instead of 'All'. But we might want to ask > why it was changed to all originally - who was confused by 'All'? > > Nicole The main issue here is that the "all" (same word) has different meanings. See the initial description of this bug: * for libraries and patrons, it means "value to use if there is no rule for this library/patron" * for itemtypes it means "otherwise", it's not exactly the same "default" Let me take another example: 3 libraries LA, LB, LC 3 patron categories PA, PB, PC 3 itemtypes IA, IB, IC If you define LA, PA, IA = 5 items LA, PA, IB = 5 items LA, PA, IC = 5 items *, *, * = 10 items it will mean one can issue 10 items from LB *and* 10 items from LC That's not the same behaviour as for itemtypes, where LA, PA, IA = 5 LA, PA, * = 10 means 10 IB *or* IC (= 10 IB, 9 IB+1IC, 8+2, 7+3,...) Different behaviour = different terms should be used ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/