https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27078
David Cook <dc...@prosentient.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dc...@prosentient.com.au
--- Comment #3 from David Cook <dc...@prosentient.com.au> ---
(In reply to Christian McDonald from comment #2)
> That makes sense, though that's conflicting with what I'm reading about
> scaling out memcached in this way. So then, what is the point of having
> multiple memcached servers (which can be configured in koha-conf.xml)? As I
> understand memcached (which I will admit is novice at best), the use of
> multiple servers is completely up to the memcached client
> implementation...something along the lines of hashing each keyitem against
> the server list, effectively tying a keyitem to a single node in the
> cluster. Because the number of nodes is known by all clients, this should
> effectively distribute keys across the nodes and ensure a cached value only
> lives on one node at a time. If a node goes down, those keys are simply
> rebased on another node.
>
> I might be completely off here too lol
I haven't set up a memcached cluster but I think it should be fine so long as
it's configured correctly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
