https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25690
--- Comment #47 from Joonas Kylmälä <joonas.kylm...@helsinki.fi> ---
(In reply to Joonas Kylmälä from comment #46)
> (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #44)
> > - if ( $res->{'itemnumber'} && $res->{'itemnumber'} ==
> > $itemnumber && $res->{'priority'} == 0) {
> >
> > Why did you remove that test?
>
> Thanks for asking. The reason I removed the line is because it equivalent of
> a reserve being found / attached and now we finally handle all the different
> cases so doing the check twice is not necessary. If you look at the patch
> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=67411 (bug
> 19116) then it should be really clear. Previously the "Reserved" return
> value had double usage/meaning, firstly it could mean an unattached hold
> (biblio or item level) or secondly it could have meant an attached hold in
> transfer. Please see the explanation also in the commit message.
And to explain even a bit more verbosely: The "$res->{'priority'} == 0" makes
the hold found/attached (when combined together with itemnumber).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
