http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7825
Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Needs Signoff |In Discussion --- Comment #24 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to comment #23) > I disagree, implicit typing is wrong, and the real fix is what Srdjan > outlined on bug 7854. Hi Chris! I agree with you, implicit typing is not what we want. But the Bug 7854 is open for 6 months and no one proposed a patch. So we have 3 (more?) solutions: 1/ Block this patch and wait for a patch for Bug 7854 (and maybe have side effect, we don't know). 2/ Keep ImplicitTyping for YesNo and remove it for others types. 3/ Considering that a YesNo admits a boolean value rather than a Choice type, it is not logical to have Yes, No and a third value (Yes and No should cover 100% of choices, but here we have a third choice) I think the option 2 is not persuasive. It requires a new layer to parse YAML. For me it sounds good to have not Yes, No and a third choice. And this patch could be in master before Bug 7854. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/