https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27730
--- Comment #2 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> --- Actually I was not aware of the setting "ignore" having this effect. The known thing is that you don't want to delete any field and subfield definitions as that will cause data loss. That's not great, but we have some documentation and warnings. For the "ignore" tab, I always assumed this was only a display setting as it's used to set the tab something is displayed on. So I think reading "Ignore" there as "don't display" is to be expected from user side. 1) Can we determin if the "ignore" always had this effect? I believe I have set "ignore" for some item fields in one of our oldest installations, but we never noticed any misbehaviour. 2) If we think this is not only to affect display, we definitely need to add at least a hint GUI wise. Maybe we should also add a list of "ignored" to the Bibliographic framework check to help people verify. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
