http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8958
Frédéric Demians <frede...@tamil.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |7421 --- Comment #2 from Frédéric Demians <frede...@tamil.fr> --- Very welcomed patch. Bug 3216 was implying such a follow-up patch, for UNIMARC, and for MARC21 (someone intersted?) In my opinion, you should propose first a patch fixing issues, and then propose a patch enhencing facets. > - The "Place" Facet cannot show up because it is mapped on 651 field > instead of 607 field. Yes. > - Some fields are missing in Unimarc facets (topics : 608, 616 ; authors : > 710, 711, 712, 716, 720, 721, 722). Check that new fields added to topic facets are searcheable. Since they are multi-part facets (coming from several subfields), biblio DOM indexing may be required. Improving facets, we can reach a point where deprecated GRS-1 indexing may be necessary. Why not a new facet for Corporate Name? Is it a good idea to mix Personal/Corporate Name? > - Serials are mapped on 225a. This field is subject to many variants > ("Collection Que sais-je?", "Que sais-je", "Que sais je?", etc). Facets > would be nicer if we used 410t. Disputable for libraries not using 410 field but only 225. > Some other fields could be better indexed : 600ab (name/surname) > instead of 600a, 601abcdef (hierarchical collectivity or congress) > instead of 601a, 604at (author+title) instead of 604a It's not a matter of indexing but of facets building, even if it's related to the ability to use Koha indexes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/