https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11175
--- Comment #131 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> --- > It will work, it supports both, the 003 will be used only for further > disambiguation in case the records have it. See also bug 27507. We do have the 003 set, but not using prefixes in $w (to clarify). Does that change your reply? I am aware 003 is standard, but as Koha does enforce 003 (the advanced editor at least does), but the plugins we have to crate analytics do not, there is some mismatch I want to check for. We should definitely move to be more standard compliant, but maybe we can have fallbacks to make this useful for people with the existing data meanwhile. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
