https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22690

--- Comment #203 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart+k...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Ere Maijala from comment #202)
> Jonathan, I've lost track of things a bit here, but since linktracker also
> tracks clicks per borrower, would it still be useful to keep the records?
> Also, if cascade delete would be used, would it only affect biblionumber,
> not itemnumber or borrowernumber? 

In my understanding we want to keep track of the number of clicks on the
records, so even if the patron of item is deleted we should keep the entry.

> Or to put it another way, if we don't want to keep the records after the
> biblio is deleted, why is biblionumber nullable in the table?

Correct, that is not consistent.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to