https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21648
Mark Rogers <marcos.rog...@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcos.rog...@gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Mark Rogers <marcos.rog...@gmail.com> --- I agree that prevention of data loss/corruption is important. It sounds like the implementation of Andrew's suggestion to have a full interface to merge both patrons (though great) is currently a barrier to getting a more functional solution for those of us who have required non-repeating patron attributes. Would it be possible to simply treat the non-repeating patron attributes the same way as the standard patron fields? That is, the default behavior would be to retain those non-repeating attributes belonging to the patron record that was chosen when initiating the merge rather than the values for those attributes provided by the non-selected patron. The screen where the merge is confirmed already has links to both patron records, allowing the differences of patron records and additional patron attributes to be compared, albeit somewhat manually. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/