https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=28761
--- Comment #9 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #8) > I noticed this the other day.. should we also be falling back to item-type > level not for loan values when the local not for loan is not set or set to > allow loans.. which value should take precedence if both are set? > > Otherwise, this looks pretty reasonable to me. Not sure I understand the question correctly, do you mean item vs. record leven not for loan? Then I think if both are set, we should use the description from item level. To me it makes sense that the more specific should win. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
