https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29457
--- Comment #14 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #12) > What about a warn during the upgrade, for NULLs? > > Userid that was a valid borrowernumber will never be restored correctly, no > idea what we can do with that. > > However the more the wait, the more we introduce bad data, we should fix > ASAP. In most cases NULL will have been stored. So the db rev makes no sense. But the question is: Does it really hurt that the manager_id field is NULL for historic cancellations. Looks to me that it does not. So we could just go with the first patch? We could perhaps print the number of NULLs found in accountlines for this reason? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
