http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=9341
mathieu saby <mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathieu.saby@univ-rennes2.f | |r --- Comment #2 from mathieu saby <mathieu.s...@univ-rennes2.fr> --- Hello In France we don't add any ponctuation in 7XX$a, so I was surprised. But, you are right, except it is only a recommandation, and not a part of the format itself. The UNIMARC manual (2008) says : "There are no standards for punctuation in this field. However, it is recommended that punctuation be retained where it is available in the source format. In source formats where punctuation is not available, but is printed out by an algorithm generated from the definition of the subfields, it is recommended that the punctuation which would be used in display be included in the UNIMARC record. Because there are no standards for punctuation in this field, recipients of records in the UNIMARC format will have to be aware of the practices adopted by the agency preparing the record; therefore agencies distributing records should attempt to be consistent in their own records." But in French version of the manual, http://www.bnf.fr/documents/B700-6-2010.pdf we read : "NdT : les exemples provenant de catalogues anglo-saxons contiennent la ponctuation prescrite, qui a été saisie et non pas générée par programme comme le veut l’usage français." (Translator note : examples from anglo-saxon catalogs contains punctuation, included in the record, and not generated by an algorithm as wants french use) So maybe it should be a syspref ? M. Saby -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/