https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29963

--- Comment #24 from Benjamin Daeuber <bdaeu...@cityoffargo.com> ---
> 
> Going forward if there are concerns with the original patch changing the
> behavior of one item form making it inconsistent with others in cataloguing
> and acq. Then I think, instead of a behavior change, it should be sufficient
> to add a hint saying that if you save the 952$d with nothing in it Koha will
> still auto-populate the 952$d with today's date. Perhaps this is the most
> straight forward solution?

I'm not sure I agree with this. I don't really see an issue with being context
aware. Hints get missed with potentially far reaching consequences in the case
of a batch edit. Logical, context aware behavior seems more user friendly. It
makes sense to populate that field in the case of serials and new items, but
not in the case of item edits. I don't really find that to be an inconsistent
behavior.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to