https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29623
--- Comment #26 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart+k...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #24) > I think we can probably call this one PQA now.. but I'd love to see a > follow-up but to convert to Koha::Cache as we've pretty much done all the > work here to make sure we're resetting the caches as required on changes and > caching for longer makes sense. Yes, maybe. However I am expecting several adjustments in test files as we are deleting all the entries from circulation_rules in some tests. > I'm also interested in David's suggestion about using ID's for the cache > key, but I've not investigated the code to validate that myself. I don't think it's possible, get_effective_rule_value does not have the ID. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
