https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31458
--- Comment #9 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomasco...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #8) > OK, So Kyle suggests we can/should remove the debarred and debarredcomment > fields from the borrowers table. > > We do however return a restricted boolean field in the current API.. I think > it makes a fair bit of sense to continue to return this piece of primary > information about the borrower there.. but it opens up the question.. should > we actually remove the field from the table now and thus require a join for > API queries or should I go ahead of convert the current date field to a > proper boolean that's maintained by add_restriction and friends? I did it a boolean so we can remove those heh. The idea is that we would just embed the restriction objects, each of which should include its own information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
