https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32558
--- Comment #46 from Kyle M Hall <k...@bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #44) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #43) > > Could you remind me why we need this? Why don't you just run another worker? > > This area has not been very stable in the last releases and I am not sure we > > should play with more forking and introduce possible regressions when an > > alternative (run more workers) is already available. > > I could be wrong but I think the premise of this change is that it would be > more difficult to update koha-worker and koha-common.init to allow for a > configurable number of workers than it would be to add more forks. > > However, I agree that it would be preferable to just run more workers. Even > if it's easier to fork, I don't think this patch goes about it quite the > right way... I think these are both great ideas, and there is no reason we can't have both :) That way we can choose how many workers we have for each queue, and how many parallel processes each worker can handle. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
