https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33606
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.druart+k...@gmail.com> --- https://irc.koha-community.org/koha/2023-05-09#i_2485635 """ it could certainly be /config/erm i.e. constrained to specific modules and instead of exposing the sysprefs list enabled modules or components in terms of your solution, it is just a matter of naming things more generically, and consistently """ Please be explicit, I don't understand. I am exposing ERMModule and ERMProviders. Why should I make the code obscure and hide that behind an other config key? Having the syspref names in tt/vue to grep make things easy. If it's really important for you, I am suggesting /config/erm { enabled => 1|0, providers => ['local', 'ebsco'], } For now. Then we will add the permission list later (for bug 32968), and it could be something like: { enabled => 1|0, providers => ['local', 'ebsco'], permissions => ['agreements.write', 'eholdings.write'], etc. } Would that work for everybody? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
