https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32478
--- Comment #14 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to David Gustafsson from comment #13) > Ok! Suppose due to forgot to fix the tests that still uses the 'NULL' value, > will do so. Why is it odd? null is valid json, NULL is not. Some things are hard to explain :) The fact that you need to type null as a valid JSON expression in a textarea is not very appealing as to user interface. (Or even stricter, valid YAML.) But I could certainly live with it :) Just document it clearly. And going bit out of scope, but why are we specifying a: [ b, c ] instead of the pure YAML approach with something like: a: - b - c We probably need some discussion/consensus about handling all such preferences. The fact that is all kind of YAML now, does however make a difference. See next comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/