https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31074
--- Comment #36 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <vic...@tuxayo.net> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #35) > 8 CPUs and 400 workers is an extreme example. > > If you're multi-tenanted, you'll have fewer workers. But if you're not > multi-tenanted, you could easily have hundreds of workers even with a small > number of CPUs, if many of the instances don't carry much load. > > Philippe has an example with 100-200 Koha instances I believe. They're > mostly going to be idle, but you'd need 200-400 workers just to have a > minimum amount of availability. > > If you were multi-tenanted, you would have a more reasonable number of > workers. But then as per the above you wouldn't allow Koha instances to > upload plugins anyway. Ok since the multi-tenant case isn't a problem here, one Koha instance will always have a reasonable number of workers vs the number of threads. So a Koha SIGHUPing it's starman master process shouldn't cause enough trouble to make option 2 of comment 19 non-viable. (IIUC) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/