https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32565
--- Comment #23 from Nick Clemens <n...@bywatersolutions.com> --- (In reply to Pedro Amorim from comment #22) > Hey guys, I'd love some feedback on my latest patch. > I think it makes sense considering build_holds_queue.pl --unallocated should > be idempotent. > I'm okay with it being dropped if you feel that's best or if I missed > something. In a system without RTHQ there are times a library would like the queue to remain static for a period of time, but have new holds be picked up. i.e. giving a library more time to fill holds until a full rebuild, so I think the switch is necessary even when not using the RTHQ. Having the switch allows this code to satisfy bug 34676 and 32328 at leats partially -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
