https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #13 from Marcel de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to Lari Strand from comment #9) > "Keeping an itemnumber in this table that does no longer exist is bad > practice." > > We still have deleted-tables so I don't consider the data as non-existing. Dont you think that we should adhere to proven standards as to SQL, normalization, etc ? :) > > If we touch these old_-tables like this and destroy this archived data that > can be linked still with deleted-tables, shouldn't we do the same to > action_logs? I consider action_logs as an "archive" table just like > old_issues or old_reserves (not sure if we do this already, though. Remove > itemnumbers/biblionumbers from action_logs that are linked to deleted > items/biblios?). Good point. There is room for further improvement indeed. But no reason to switch good to less. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
