https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36281
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Passed QA |Failed QA --- Comment #6 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nick Clemens from comment #5) > I added my sign off, this does what it says, but I would like the RM to > decide > > If there is no value defined for zero in RESTRICTED, then the item will be > saved as null. > If you add a value, you still need to set the item to '0' and choose the new > description. > > Before this patch - create a 0, and you can use it or not, and it displays > if used > > After this patch - create a 0, use it, it doesn't show? That seems > inconsistent - can you explain your use case? Hm, this does sound a bit inconsistent. I'd be interested in how we handle the same for other similar status (WITHDRAWN, DAMAGED, NOTLOAN ...), I think we should keep things consistent. Also interested in the use case! Why would you define an entry for 0? (Failed QA = Waiting for Feedback) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
