https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36369
--- Comment #15 from Tomás Cohen Arazi <tomasco...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #14) > (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi from comment #13) > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #11) > > > 2. So far we have decided to provide what is implemented/used. With this > > > we > > > will offer in the view usage of routes that may not be implemented yet. > > > > Am I right to interpret what you say like: 'if the Vue page doesn't allow > > deleting the resource, we shouldn't implement a delete() method'? > > > > It feels to me that this shouldn't be an issue... and would allow people to > > reuse this more? > > Yes it is what I meant for "used". And I agree it is not really a problem. > However it can be a problem for "implemented": If the endpoint does not > exist in the controller should we provide it in the api-client? It does not > make sense to me. I think it is fair that a dev can try, but then get a 404. I would like to hear from others. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
