https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36799
--- Comment #6 from Janusz Kaczmarek <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #4) > As we have an expert for authorities/001 with Marcel, could you give your > opinion? Is 001 being something other than numeric really impossible today? Well, in fact, we are not talking here specifically about 001 which--in general--can contain anything. We are talking about Koha authid stored--in standard Koha setup--in 001. And Koha auth_header.authid is BIGINT UNSIGNED [20] (cf. https://schema.koha-community.org/main/tables/auth_header.html). Theoretically, one could store authid in a different place--the patch does nothing with 001, it does with authid. Could you consider changing the status, please ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
