https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37544
--- Comment #13 from David Nind <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Angela Berrett from comment #12) > We have over 230,000 items with no branch, collection code, and/or shelf > location. Is there a reference to a bug/development where the changes to > the Holdings table were discussed and these fields were decided to be > required? Just curious where this came from since we weren't prepared for > it. Thanks! The changes to the holdings table were made in bug 33568 (it's a long bug to read through, and I didn't work on it - so I'm not sure whether it was intended or not, or whether these subfields have been implicitly required for some time). The main purpose of the bug was to improve loading performance when then are many items for a record - something that has been an issue for some time. I created bug 37416 to try and share some ways to identify any potential issues with your data, and how to fix them up. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
