https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37533
--- Comment #14 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #13) > Why don't we allow "in" then? That's a good question. I imagine that "in" must've worked, although SQL::Abstract::Classic (and SQL::Abstract) seems to dictate "-in" in their docs. But the docs don't really explain it. Looking at the SQL::Abstract source code, it looks like it's expecting modifiers to start with "-". It's a bit hard to tell at a glance, but it kind of seems that "-in" and "in" might yield different structures (or at least take different code paths to get to the same place). Not sure if it's worth investigating or not, but probably good to require the "-" prefix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
