https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=27859

David Gustafsson <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Patch doesn't apply         |Needs Signoff

--- Comment #47 from David Gustafsson <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to David Cook from comment #44)
> Comment on attachment 178145 [details] [review]
> Bug 27859: Export staff interface search results when using Elasticsearch
> 
> Review of attachment 178145 [details] [review]:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> :::
> installer/data/mysql/atomicupdate/bug_27859-
> add_enable_search_result_marc_export_sysprefs.pl
> @@ +16,5 @@
> > +        $dbh->do(q{ INSERT IGNORE INTO systempreferences (variable, value, 
> > options, explanation, type) VALUES ('ElasticsearchSearchResultExportLimit', 
> > NULL, NULL, 'Search result export limit', 'integer') });
> > +        say $out "Added new system preference 
> > 'ElasticsearchSearchResultExportLimit'";
> > +
> > +        $dbh->do(q{ UPDATE systempreferences SET options = 
> > 'base64ISO2709|ARRAY' WHERE variable = 'ElasticsearchMARCFormat' });
> > +        $dbh->do(q{ UPDATE systempreferences SET value = 'base64ISO2709' 
> > WHERE variable = 'ElasticsearchMARCFormat' AND value = 'ISO2709' });
> 
> I like the idea of changing ISO2709 to base64ISO2709, as it's annoying to
> translate between base64ISO2709 and ISO2709 (whereas ARRAY and MARCXML can
> be matched easily). That said... that seems like a different bug report to
> me. It'll also conflict with bug 28370 if it gets accepted, so we'll want to
> be careful there.

Did you link to the wrong bug? Seems it has been pushed and is not related.

I agree it's not ideal to have the format name change as part of this bug, I
just hoped I could sneak it in I suppose. Would be pretty simple to break it
out I suppose. The syspref value actually was base64ISO2709 in bug 19893 before
it was removed since I believe we didn't want to allow the user to select a
less performant format, but was reintroduced in bug 22258 as ISO2709 when the
ARRAY format was added.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to