https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=38345
--- Comment #24 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi (tcohen) from comment #21) > This is all non sense IMHO. They went rogue and disabled the competition > usage. Even though ES went back to using a libre/open source license. There was lost confidence in the whole journey. I didn't know during that time they also did this. That helps even less to regain confidence... So one more reason part of people might feel that AWS's OpenSearch it still a safer option. And that if reasonably possible, there is still value in having it working in Koha :/ (news about OS: even if it's now under the umbrella of the Linux Foundation, still ~90% of top 30 contributors last year are AWS employees) Both parties made somewhat logical decisions/bets to maximize their profits before anything else and in the end we pay a price in totally useless work 🤬. Especially in a language without first class library support. (having to support two libs would have been quite the useless work also) > They went rogue and disabled the competition usage. I quickly looked at the main official OpenSearch clients and it seems they don't even support Elasticsearch so everyone everywhere using ES/OS is screwed in some way for dual support. Back to the above paragraph... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
