https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=37829
--- Comment #17 from Pedro Amorim <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Paul Derscheid from comment #15) > Do you have a prominent spot I can look at that you would describe as some > sort of reference implementation? Yeah I just discovered bug 39664 while testing this, the steps there provide you with an example of the current implementation. (In reply to Paul Derscheid from comment #15) > I actually wanted it to be the other way around. Since > additional-fields-entry.js is so small in scope, I just wanted to keep it as > an interface to the new additional-fields.js, and cover that functionality > as well. That works just the same imo, this is why I said use/extend the current implementation. As long as we don't add a new standalone implementation of additional fields. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
