https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=35920

--- Comment #29 from David Cook <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Tomás Cohen Arazi (tcohen) from comment #28)
> This was my original idea, pretty much what David suggests.

Sorry for missing that before!

> I was trying to write it this morning when I hit a roadblock: I wanted to
> prepare it to support delayed retries, and figured it would require manually
> installing and maintaining the setup for the delayed queue plugin (not
> shipped in Debian).
>
> And I understood this would need to be set to not-default for the general
> public because of that. So a niche use case with too little gain so far. So
> the question is: who’s gonna maintain that? Implementing a feature would
> require doing it in both for sure. Who would do it?
> 
> Those are my questions.

Yeah, I just saw that bug report. I've added some comments there. I think that
the solution for delayed retries should be found in a task scheduler rather
than a job worker. That's even the solution suggested by the developer of that
RabbitMQ plugin.

That's actually something I bumped into with bug 10662 because I was performing
OAI-PMH harvests using background job workers, and I needed to be able to
schedule future harvests. I did that by having the worker add a task to the
task scheduler.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to