https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=16821
--- Comment #15 from Christopher Brannon <cbran...@cdalibrary.org> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #14) > (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #13) > > ElasticSearch. Well, if it is the correct number despite the > > maxRecordsForFacets, then that is misleading to those of us setting this up. > > Regardless, not all library branches show, and they should. Our at least we > > should be given that option. Along with consideration for locations and item > > types. > > I'd argue that showing all would not be the desired outcome for everyone. As > long as the missing of the facet indicates correctly that there is no result > for this setting. > > @Nick can you confirm that maxRecordsForFacets is not relevant for > Elasticsearch or when using Zebra facets maybe? I can promise you, I would not be going down this path if that were the case. We have items at locations we know exist and those locations are not showing up in the facets because they are not within the range of the maxRecordsForFacets. I also understand that you feel that it might not be the desired outcome for everyone, which is why I requested that this be an OPTION. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
