https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=39990
trevor.diam...@mainlib.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |trevor.diam...@mainlib.org
--- Comment #1 from trevor.diam...@mainlib.org ---
My cooperative of 42 libraries would also appreciate the ability to nest hold
groups, similar to the initial example. Rather than think of it in terms of
group and subgroup (which implies just two levels), I would prefer a way where
we can "order" the groups in terms of nesting.
Or would it make more sense to rank the various groups to which a library
belongs in terms of ascending size. So the smallest group gets the first
considerations, and continuing up in size until the request is filled or every
library in the system is eligible.
If the ranking is automatically applied through this kind of logic, there's a
lower hurdle to using the feature, but if there are two groups of a similar
size, it would be random which is considered "first". You could have more
control of the order if there was additional group feature of "priority" like
we see for item groups, which lets you control the order they appear.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
