https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40062
--- Comment #3 from Tomás Cohen Arazi (tcohen) <tomasco...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall (khall) from comment #2) > > If we change the ORDER BY to "priority ASC, reserve_id ASC" I think it will > behave more intuitively! I just tried it with my patch and the results are similar. The big question here is: what is the expected behavior? If I add 4 holds on the same item, with priority=1. For me, if 1 is the highest, then it means the result should be: * p=1 -> hold_4 * p=2 -> hold_3 * p=3 -> hold_2 * p=4 -> hold_1 i.e. the hold is inserted with the requested priority, and the existing ones are shifted if required. And if we had: * p=1 -> hold_1 * p=2 -> hold_2 * p=3 -> hold_3 and we added `hold_4` with priority=2, I would expect the result to be: * p=1 -> hold_1 * p=2 -> hold_4 * p=3 -> hold_2 * p=4 -> hold_3 Does it make sense? I got it wrong? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
