https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40307
--- Comment #5 from Mathieu Saby <[email protected]> --- Oh I misunderstood the authority type config page. I thought the "210" for CO authority type was the bibliographic field. It is the field of the auth record. So it cannot work with a CO authority But I don't understand why an authoriry with a 200 heading should be used in 210$c of bibliographic record. Authorities with a 200 heading are for Personnal names (https://www.transition-bibliographique.fr/unimarc/manuel-unimarc-format-notices-autorite/#Bloc%202XX ), and 210$c is the Publisher. Most of the time the publisher will be a corporate name, not a personnal name. Besides, I never worked in a library using authority to control the publisher field. Is that feature really used ? Is there something similar in MARC21 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
