https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=40792
--- Comment #10 from Steve, OSLRI, USA <[email protected]> --- I could see both sides of this... that is wanting to satisfy the hold and not wanted to satisfy the hold. I think the most elegant way to do this would be at the itemtype level. Just a true/false that allows an itemtype to fill a hold. That would allow a library or consortia to take a more nuanced, situational approach. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
