https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36506
--- Comment #37 from Nick Clemens (kidclamp) <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 192931 --> https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/attachment.cgi?id=192931&action=edit Bug 36506: (QA follow-up) Add test for missing circulation rule This adds a test case to verify that when no lost_item_processing_fee circulation rule exists for a branch/itemtype combination, the system correctly defaults to 0 (no processing fee charged). The test confirms: - No PROCESSING account line is created when the rule is missing - The LOST fee is still created normally (only processing fee affected) - The // 0 fallback in C4::Accounts::chargelostitem works correctly Test plan: 1. prove t/db_dependent/Accounts.t 2. Verify all tests pass, including the new "missing circulation rule" test case Signed-off-by: Martin Renvoize <[email protected]> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
