http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10734
--- Comment #3 from Katrin Fischer <katrin.fisc...@bsz-bw.de> --- > Good point. I wonder how we should handle dates like uuuu or 190u or 19uu. > Maybe it makes sense just to include definite completely numeric dates? Or > maybe do a label for uuuu like "Unknown" and change the u to a question mark > for other cases like 190? or 19??, perhaps? I think the second would make a bit more sense to me. > I wrote a little TT plugin a while ago to change codes into nice labels for > the facets, which I think I mentioned to you, but the problem was that it > had hardcoded strings :/. Hm, not sure I remember. If the strings can be in an include or similar, we can translate them. > Is there a way of maybe using the "language_descriptions" table to use > translated strings? I think that would probably be the best option for a language facet. > We would run into the same problem with a record type facet. I think it is solvable especially when the options and descriptions you want to have are somehow limited by the standard. > Actually...with record type...we could probably use authorized values like > we have for item type and shelving location. I suppose that's not hardcoded > but I suppose that probably still presents translation issues. I always prefer template translation over using authorised values because the latter are one language only currently. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
