https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=31717

--- Comment #14 from Fridolin Somers <[email protected]> ---
> Why write the same code to two fields now? I did not check the UNIMARC specs, 
> but is it really meant to duplicate info here? Or is it meant to use only one 
> of the two?

It is new from bibliographic transition.
214 is more complex that 210, it meant to use only one of the two.

We can find the info here :
https://www.transition-bibliographique.fr/unimarc/manuel-unimarc-format-bibliographique/#Bloc2XX

For the other points, we may create a bug report to rewrite this value builder.
Maybe we will use API here at some point.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to