https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41932
--- Comment #20 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #19) > > It just seems a bit risky? Like it would be very easy to get the wrong rule > > applying to the wrong items? > > What I mean is... even as a separate module I don't think it would be > enough? > > What I've been finding in some libraries is that they make up a variety of > call number schemes and expect them all to sort automagically. Of course, > they'd have to choose the correct scheme, so maybe having them all as > Generic is best to reduce mental load on cataloguers. > > I don't know. It's a tricky one. In a way, something is better than what we > have now. I'm going to need to think more on this one. > > I should try some of my real world call number examples... I guess you should try it out. I replaced 400.000 callnumbers and we have a lot of different call number schemes.. At first I was trying to match specific schemes with the (optional) filter regex, but the more general rule I created later (see above) works perfectly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
