https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22972
Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #31 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- QA review: 1. There is no check on the value entered. If you enter 0241 instead of 024$1 it saved as it without warning, but then it fails silently when cataloguing. 2. The placeholder is "024$a" but the hint says: "Enter the authority subfield that should be copied from the authority record to the bibliographic record in $1. E.g., in MARC21, field 024$1 in the authority record should be copied to field 700$1 in the bibliographic record" Shouldn't the placeholder be "024$1" then? 3. Shouldn't we display the value in the authority types table in a new column? 4. If there are several $1 ("aaa" and "bbb"), the advanced editor is not correct: 700 _ _ ‡aCameron, Debra.‡1aaabbb‡9380 5. "this works in UNIMARC too" But we only modify MARC21's XSLTs? 6. Missing tests for "sub merge" 7. Isn't there a problem when merging?: the $1 on a linked biblio field is only replaced when the target authority has values to copy. So removing an authority's 024$1 or merging it into one without an ID will keep the old $1 on the biblio. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
